Only tangentially baseball related (aka, Adventures In Disclaimerville)
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 by ptmYou don’t have to have been watching the playoffs recently to have seen one of the many, many ads for ED drugs. ED is the new term for impotence (since I guess people don’t want to be called impotent…it sounds negative.) Apparently a lot of guys have erection problems, so there are a lot of Viagra and Cialis ads around.
Having seen a lot of the ads recently, I’ve been picking up on more details to pay attention to and ponder. Apart from the whole, “why are those two old people flirting in two individual bathtubs on a hillside?” thing, I’ve paid more attention to the long medical/legal disclaimers. One of them is this:
“Use of Cialis (or whatever) does not protect against HIV or AIDS.”
Seriously? You need to say that? I know that lawyers and legal departments over-worry and add more than necessary to cover the asses of the companies advertising the medicine. But…who are the idiots who think that, just because a pill can help you get a boner, it will stop that boner from catching a deadly disease? I guess the thought is that someone out there is thinking, “Oh, well since I wouldn’t be able to get it up otherwise, this must stop me from getting something awful once it is up.” Really? Have people become that dumb?
Maybe they have. To those people for whom that was written, please remember this: if any of these pills could stop you from getting AIDS, it would not be advertised as boner pills. They would be advertised as the pill that will stop you from getting AIDS.
Idiots.